

 |
Data standards organizations have been trying for years to eliminate
free-formatted text from their data exchange formats, without
much success. Certain kinds of information cannot practically
be encoded and maintained, either because there are too many
values, too many nuances, or because the range of values changes
frequently. And although structured data is optimal for system-to-system
communication, it is both an unnatural and undesirable way for
humans to communicate with each other. This is why most standards
provide free-formatted text fields such as: "comments",
"remarks", "details", "narrative",
"explanation", "history", or "address".
Thus, it is extremely unlikely that free-formatted text will
ever be completed eliminated from any data standard, no matter
how complete or robust. The need for text parsers will always
exist. |
|
|
|